Reasons for repeat urgent cardiac procedures within the same day.

BACKGROUND: With advances in technology and technique, the expectations are that patients undergoing procedures in the cardiac catheterization laboratory will not need to return for a repeat procedure within the same day. OBJECTIVES: Report why subjects undergoing cardiac procedures return urgently to the catheterization laboratory for a repeat procedure during the same day. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who were brought back to the cardiac catheterization laboratory within the same day for a repeat procedure. The reasons for index and repeat procedure were identified. Patients who were transferred from an outside center after an initial procedure at other centers were excluded. RESULTS: Between November 2013 and January 2022, 55,942 catheterization procedures were performed at our institution, of which 140 entries were included in our analysis. Common reasons for the index procedure were diagnostic angiography (35.0%), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI, 29.2%), and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (15.0%). The most common reason for bringing these patients back to the cardiac catheterization laboratory within the same day was vascular complications (24.2%), followed by repeat PCI (20.7%), need for hemodynamic support (15.0%), heart team discussion and PCI (10%), and pacemaker implantation (10%). Acute limb ischemia was the most commonly identified vascular complication (7.1%), followed by pseudoaneurysm (5%). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that a very small number of patients underwent repeat procedures within the same day. Special attention should be paid to vascular access and closure and assessment of recurrent chest pain postprocedure, as these are the main reasons for same-day repeat procedures.

Mother-daughter technique for kinked catheter retrieval from radial artery.

Catheter kinking is not an uncommon scenario during cardiac catheterization via transradial access in patients with tortuous vascular anatomy. Several noninvasive and invasive methods have been described to unkink and retrieve the kinked catheter out of the vessel. We present a novel mother-daughter technique to retrieve a kinked radial artery catheter.

Gender disparities related to clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing transseptal procedures.

PURPOSE: Explore gender disparities in patients undergoing transseptal puncture (TSP) for selected transcatheter cardiac intervention procedures. METHODS: Patients who underwent TSP from January 2015 through September 2021 were reviewed. Primary outcomes were procedural and in-hospital major adverse events. Secondary endpoints were procedural success and hospitalization length of stay (LOS) >1 day. Unadjusted and multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analyses were performed to assess gender differences for in-hospital adverse events. RESULTS: The study cohort comprised 510 patients (mean [SD] age, 74 [14.0] years); 246 women (48 %) underwent TSP for left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) or transcatheter edge-to-edge-repair (TEER). Compared with men, women were younger, had higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores, and were more likely to have had a prior ischemic stroke, but were less likely to have paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. After multivariable adjustment, there were no differences between genders in aborted or canceled procedures (odds ratio [OR]: 0.43; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.10-1.96; p = 0.277), any adverse events (OR: 1.00; 95 % CI: 0.58-1.70; p = 0.98), major adverse events (OR: 1.60; 95 % CI: 0.90-2.80; p = 0.11), or death (OR: 1.00; 95 % CI: 0.20-5.00; p = 0.31). Subgroup analysis for LAAO procedures showed that at 30 days, women had higher rates of adverse events, major adverse cardiac events, and LOS >1 day. CONCLUSIONS: Men and women showed no differences in procedural success and in-hospital adverse outcomes in unadjusted analysis and after multivariable adjustment, despite women having a higher risk profile among patients undergoing TSP. However, compared with men, women undergoing LAAO experienced a higher rate of in-hospital adverse events irrespective of TSP.

Computed tomography fractional flow reserve discrepancies with invasive angiography and physiology - Case series.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography with fractional flow reserve (CT-FFR) is increasingly common in assessing coronary artery disease. CASE PRESENTATION: We report five cases of discrepancies that led to changes in treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This report highlights discordant findings between modalities, which should be considered during the diagnostic assessment of chest pain.

Self-expanding and balloon-expandable valves in low risk TAVR patients.

BACKGROUND: Recent randomized studies have broadened the indication of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) to also include low-surgical-risk patients. However, the data on self-expanding (SE) and balloon-expandable (BE) valves in low-risk patients remain sparse. METHODS: The current study is a post hoc analysis of combined data from both LRT 1.0 and 2.0 trials comparing BE and SE transcatheter heart valves. RESULTS: A total of 294 patients received a BE valve, and 102 patients received an SE valve. The 30-day clinical outcomes were similar across both groups except for stroke (4.9% vs. 0.7%, p = 0.014) and permanent pacemaker implantation (17.8% vs. 5.8%, p < 0.001), which were higher in the SE cohort than the BE cohort. No difference was observed in terms of paravalvular leak (≥moderate) between the groups (0% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.577). SE patients had higher aortic valve area (1.92 ± 0.43 mm2 vs. 1.69 ± 0.45 mm2, p < 0.001) and lower mean gradient (8.93 ± 3.53 mmHg vs. 13.41 ± 4.73 mmHg, p < 0.001) than BE patients. In addition, the rate of subclinical leaflet thrombosis was significantly lower in SE patients (5.6% vs. 13.8%, p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: In this non-randomized study assessing SE and BE valves in low-risk TAVR patients, SE valves are associated with better hemodynamics and lesser leaflet thrombosis, with increased rates of stroke and permanent pacemaker implantation at 30 days; however, this could be due to certain patient-dependent factors not fully evaluated in this study. The long-term implications of these outcomes on structural valve durability remain to be further investigated. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY: LRT 1.0: NCT02628899 LRT 2.0: NCT03557242.

Prognostic implication of hemoglobin reduction with and without clinical bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Bleeding events are associated with higher mortality rates in patients with cardiovascular diseases, including patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing coronary revascularization. We aimed to determine whether a reduction in hemoglobin (Hgb) from pre- to postpercutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with or without evidence of clinical bleeding, is a correlate of in-hospital mortality for patients presenting with ACS who underwent primary PCI. METHODS: We divided 33816 consecutive patients with ACS who underwent PCI into three categories: (1) target group (defined as Hgb reduction without overt bleeding [n = 112]); (2) Hgb reduction with overt bleeding (n = 48); and (3) control group (defined as no Hgb reduction and no overt bleeding [n = 3156]). Hgb reduction was defined as a drop of >3 g/dL in Hgb value from preprocedure and postprocedure during the index hospitalization. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. We used logistic regression to examine the relationship between Hgb reduction with and without bleeding and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: In crude analysis, the Hgb reduction with overt bleed group had a higher in-hospital mortality rate (16.7%) than the target (9.8%) and control groups (0.6%). Adjusted logistic regression estimates a 0.393 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.137, 1.869) odds ratio for in-hospital death of the target group over the Hgb reduction with bleed group, and a 54.517 (95% CI: 2.07, >1000) odds ratio of the target group over the control group. CONCLUSIONS: In patients presenting with ACS undergoing PCI, Hgb reduction with and without overt bleeding were both independently associated with in-hospital mortality.

Aspirin Versus Warfarin after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients: 2-Year Follow-Up.

Subclinical leaflet thrombosis occurs with transcatheter heart valves (THVs) and could be associated with structural valve deterioration. The current guidelines recommend the use of antiplatelet agents after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) but not the routine use of oral anticoagulation. Our study examines the effects of short-term warfarin therapy on THV hemodynamics at 24 months after TAVR in low-risk patients. Low-risk patients who underwent TAVR were randomly allocated 1:1 to receive low-dose aspirin (n = 50) or low-dose aspirin plus warfarin (n = 44). After 30 days of treatment, ongoing medication regimens, including anticoagulation, were at the physicians' discretion. Follow-up after a period of 24 months was available for clinical and echocardiographic outcomes. At the 24-month mark, follow-up echocardiography of the randomly allocated patients revealed just 1 additional case of new structural valve deterioration in the aspirin group (compared with the occurrence within 30 days), based on the Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 definitions. There were also no differences in mean pressure gradients (11.5 ± 0.5 mm Hg vs 11.05 ± 4.0 mm Hg, p = 0.6) or peak velocity (2.2 ± 0.5 m/s vs 2.1 ± 0.4 m/s, p = 0.7) between the groups. A composite end point (mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction) did not show any difference between the groups at long-term follow-up (p = 0.07). In conclusion, in low-risk patients who underwent TAVR, short-term anticoagulation with warfarin did not impact clinical outcomes or THV hemodynamics by echocardiography at 24 months.

Impact of IVUS and OCT on physician decision-making during post-PCI optimization.

BACKGROUND: Intravascular imaging (IVI) has been available as a complementary diagnostic tool in addition to coronary angiography for more than two decades. Prior studies have suggested that IVI influences physician decision making in up to 27 % of cases during post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) optimization. However, no studies have compared the two intracoronary imaging modalities (intravascular ultrasound [IVUS] vs. optical coherence tomography [OCT]) in shaping physician decisions post-PCI. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed IVI studies performed during PCI at a tertiary care center. IVUS and OCT cases performed by a single operator with expertise in both imaging studies were selected. The primary endpoint was the physician reaction rate during post-PCI optimization comparing IVUS vs. OCT. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients underwent IVUS evaluation, and 146 underwent OCT evaluation, post-PCI. The primary endpoint did not differ between IVUS-guided vs OCT-guided PCI optimization (35.2 % vs. 31.5 %, p = 0.505). The predominant cause of abnormalities deemed unsatisfactory by the implanting physician warranting further intervention were stent under-expansion (26.1 % vs. 19.2 %, p = 0.163), followed by malapposition (2.1 % vs. 6.2 %, p = 0.085), and dissection (3.5 % vs 4.1 %, p = 0.794). Overall, IVI using either IVUS or OCT influenced the physician decision in 33.3 % of cases. CONCLUSION: In this first study comparing IVUS- and OCT-guided PCI to assess their impact on physician decision making during post-PCI optimization, the primary endpoint of physician reaction rate was similar for IVUS vs. OCT. The use of post-PCI IVI changed physician management in one third of cases.

Evolut PRO/PRO+ versus Evolut R system for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

BACKGROUND: The self-expanding CoreValve Evolut PRO/PRO+ transcatheter aortic valve was designed to overcome the limitations of its forerunner, Evolut R. Evolut PRO/PRO+ offers the lowest delivery profile for 23-29 mm valves, with an external tissue wrap on all valve sizes. We compared safety and efficacy of Evolut PRO/PRO+ and Evolut R. METHODS: We analyzed 300 patients enrolled in the EPROMPT Registry against a historical control cohort of 242 patients who received Evolut R. The two arms were matched (1:1) via propensity-score methodology by accounting for differences in Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality scores, yielding 440 patients. The endpoints included in-hospital safety clinical outcomes, all-cause mortality, and echocardiographic parameters at 30 days and 1 year. RESULTS: After propensity-score matching, cardiac death (0.5% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.995), stroke (1.6% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.410), life-threatening bleeding (1.1% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.139), major vascular complications (0.5% vs. 0.9%, p = 0.653), and pacemaker implantation (16.9% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.345) were comparable between the Evolut PRO/PRO+ and Evolut R groups. Likewise, the rates of all-cause mortality were similar both at 30 days (0.5% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.315) and 1 year (1.8% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.159). The rates of moderate paravalvular leak (5.7% vs. 2.6%, p = 0.402), and mean gradient (7.27 ± 3.25 mmHg vs. 8.84 ± 4.36 mmHg, p = 0.105) were also comparable between groups at 1 year. CONCLUSION: Our largest-to-date observational study suggests that the Evolut PRO/PRO+ system is safe and effective in treating severe aortic stenosis, with commensurate 30-day and 1-year mortality and similar 1-year echocardiographic hemodynamic outcomes in comparison to Evolut R.

Early experience with the Evolut FX self-expanding valve vs. Evolut PRO+ for patients with aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR.

BACKGROUND: The Evolut FX system is the most recent generation of self-expandable transcatheter heart valve (THV) technology. This study aims to report the early experience and outcomes associated with this system. METHODS: Our analysis included 200 consecutive patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement at our center from 2022 to 2023. The first cohort comprised the last 100 patients who received the Evolut PRO+ THV, while the second cohort included the first 100 patients who received the Evolut FX THV. The primary endpoints of the study were defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-3 (VARC-3) criteria, which included technical success (at exit from procedure), device success (at discharge or at 30 days), and early safety (at 30 days). RESULTS: The study groups demonstrated no significant differences in baseline characteristics, including co-morbidities, pre-procedural imaging, and echocardiography. VARC-3 technical success rate was 99 % for both valves. The VARC-3 device success rate for the Evolut FX was 92 % compared to 97 % for the Evolut PRO+ (p = 0.12), and VARC-3 early safety rate was 80.1 % for the Evolut PRO+ vs. 81.5 % for the Evolut FX (p = 0.82). The in-hospital permanent pacemaker implantation rate for the Evolut FX was 12 % compared to 9 % for the Evolut PRO+ (p = 0.21). There were no differences in clinical outcomes, such as mortality or stroke, between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The Evolut FX THV performed well when used for patients with severe aortic stenosis, demonstrating high success with low complication rates when compared to an earlier generation of self-expanding THV.

[Efficacité du tirofiban intracoronaire avant pose d'un stent suivi d'une perfusion dans une charge de thrombus importante prouvée par angiographie : une étude randomisée]. / Efficacy of pre stenting intracoronary tirofiban followed by infusion in angiographically proven large thrombus burden : A randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: The presence of angiographic thrombus is associated with poor outcomes in contemporary cardiology practice. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in such lesions is associated with slow flow and no-reflow phenomenon which translate into poor clinical outcomes. METHODS: This was a single-centre, prospective, open-label, randomized controlled study with 50 patients each in intervention group and control group. Patients with angiographically proven large thrombus burden were recruited. In the intervention group, patients were given loading dose of intracoronary tirofiban (25 mcg/kg infused over 5 minutes) followed by prolonged infusion of tirofiban (0.15 mcg/kg/min for 12-18 hours) followed by PCI after 48-72 hours interval. In control group patients were taken up directly for PCI during the index procedure. Outcomes were assessed angiographically and in terms of clinical endpoints. RESULTS: The primary composite-endpoint of recurrent angina, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, target lesion revascularization and unscheduled CABG was significantly lower in the intervention arm compared to control arm (4% vs 16%, p = 0.04). Amongst the secondary endpoints, a statistically significant 30-day increase in ejection fraction from baseline was observed in the intervention group compared to the control group (1.6 ± 1.3 vs 0.2 ± 0.4, p = 0.0001). Overall mortality was similar in the two groups (4% vs 8%, p = 0.39). The primary safety endpoint of major bleeding was also similar in the 2 groups (2% vs 0%, p = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Tirofiban use prior to PCI in high thrombus burden was associated with improved clinical and angiographic endpoints with similar adverse events compared to controls.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement and Impact of Subclinical Leaflet Thrombosis in Low-Risk Patients: LRT Trial 4-Year Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The LRT trial (Low-Risk Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement [TAVR]) demonstrated the safety and feasibility of TAVR in low-risk patients, with excellent 1- and 2-year outcomes. The objective of the current study is to provide the overall clinical outcomes and the impact of 30-day hypoattenuated leaflet thickening (HALT) on structural valve deterioration at 4 years. METHODS: The prospective, multicenter LRT trial was the first Food and Drug Administration-approved investigational device exemption study to evaluate feasibility and safety of TAVR in low-risk patients with symptomatic severe tricuspid aortic stenosis. Clinical outcomes and valve hemodynamics were documented annually through 4 years. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were enrolled, and follow-up was available on 177 patients at 4 years. The rates of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular death were 11.9% and 3.3%, respectively. The stroke rate rose from 0.5% at 30 days to 7.5% at 4 years, and permanent pacemaker implantation rose from 6.5% at 30 days to 11.7% at 4 years. Endocarditis was detected in 2.5% of the cohort, with no new cases reported between 2 and 4 years. Transcatheter heart valve hemodynamics remained excellent post-procedure and were maintained (mean gradient 12.56±5.54 mm Hg and aortic valve area 1.69±0.52 cm2) at 4 years. At 30 days, HALT was observed in 14% of subjects who received a balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve. There was no difference in valve hemodynamics between patients with and without HALT (mean gradient 14.94±5.01 mm Hg versus 12.3±5.57 mm Hg; P=0.23) at 4 years. The overall rate of structural valve deterioration was 5.8%, and there was no impact of HALT on valve hemodynamics, endocarditis, or stroke at 4 years. CONCLUSIONS: TAVR in low-risk patients with symptomatic severe tricuspid aortic stenosis was found to be safe and durable at 4 years. Structural valve deterioration rates were low irrespective of the type of valve, and the presence of HALT at 30 days did not affect structural valve deterioration, transcatheter valve hemodynamics, and stroke rate at 4 years. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT02628899.

Intravascular Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Severely Calcified Coronary Artery Disease: A DISRUPT CAD III Intravascular Ultrasound Substudy.

BACKGROUND: Coronary intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has emerged as a novel technique for the treatment of severely calcified coronary lesions. We evaluated the mechanism and efficacy of IVL in facilitating optimal stent implantation in heavily calcified coronary lesions using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). METHODS: Forty-six patients were initially enrolled as a part of the Disrupt CAD III study. Of these, 33 had pre-IVL, 24 had post-IVL, and 44 had post-stent IVUS evaluation. The final analysis was performed on 18 patients who had IVUS images interpretable at all three intervals. The primary endpoint was increase in minimum lumen area (MLA) from pre-IVL to post-IVL treatment to post-stenting. RESULTS: Pre-IVL, MLA was 2.75 ± 0.84 mm2, percent area stenosis was 67.22 % ± 20.95 % with maximum calcium angle of 266.90° ± 78.30°, confirming severely calcified lesions. After IVL, MLA increased to 4.06 ± 1.41 mm2 (p = 0.0003), percent area stenosis decreased to 54.80 % ± 25.71 % (p = 0.0009), and maximum calcium angle decreased to 239.40° ± 76.73° (p = 0.003). There was a further increase in MLA to 6.84 ± 2.18 mm2 (p < 0.0001) and decrease in percent area stenosis to 30.33 % ± 35.08 % (p < 0.0001) post-stenting with minimum stent area of 6.99 ± 2.14 mm2. The success rate of stent delivery, implantation, and post-stent dilation was 100 % post-IVL. CONCLUSION: In this first study evaluating the mechanism of IVL using IVUS, the primary endpoint of increase in MLA from pre-IVL to post-IVL treatment to post-stenting was successfully achieved. Our study showed that the use of IVL-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention is associated with improved vessel compliance, facilitating optimal stent implantation in de novo severely calcified lesions.

TAVR in 2023: Who Should Not Get It?

Since the first transcatheter delivery of an aortic valve prosthesis was performed by Cribier et al in 2002, the picture of aortic stenosis (AS) therapeutics has changed dramatically. Initiated from an indication of inoperable to high surgical risk, extending to intermediate and low risk, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is now an approved treatment for patients with severe, symptomatic AS across all the risk categories. The current evidence supports TAVR as a frontline therapy for treating severe AS. The crucial question remains concerning the subset of patients who still are not ideal candidates for TAVR because of certain inherent anatomic, nonmodifiable, and procedure-specific factors. Therefore, in this study, we focus on these scenarios and reasons for referring selected patients for surgical aortic valve replacement in 2023.

Going under the bridge: unmasking ischaemia and endothelial dysfunction of myocardial bridging: a case report.

Background: Physiological assessment of myocardial bridging prevents unnecessary interventions. Non-invasive workup or visual coronary artery compression may underestimate the underlying ischaemia associated with myocardial bridging in symptomatic patients. Case summary: A 74-year-old male presented to the outpatient clinic with chest pain and shortness of breath on exertion. He underwent coronary artery calcium scan showing an elevated calcium score of 404. On follow-up, he endorsed progressive worsening of symptoms with chest pain and decreased exercise tolerance. He was then referred for coronary angiography that revealed mid-left anterior descending myocardial bridging with initial normal resting full-cycle ratio of 0.92. Further workup after ruling out coronary microvascular disease demonstrated abnormal hyperaemic full-cycle ratio of 0.80 with a diffuse rise across the myocardial bridging segment on pullback. Our patient also had increased spastic response to hyperaemia on angiography, supporting the presence of underlying endothelial dysfunction and ischaemia, likely contributing to his exertional symptomology. The patient was started on beta-blocker therapy with improvement in symptoms and resolution of chest pain on follow-up. Conclusion: Our case highlights the importance of thorough workup of myocardial bridging in symptomatic patients to better understand the underlying physiology and endothelial function after ruling out microvascular disease and consideration of hyperaemic testing if symptoms are suggestive of ischaemia.

Protamine-induced Acute Thrombosis in a Post-TAVR Patient: A Word of Caution.

Major vascular complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) are a pertinent issue and associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We herein describe a case of acute limb ischemia following the administration of protamine sulfate (PS) that was administered to mitigate a bleeding complication post-failure of a vascular access closure device. PS should be used cautiously for the prevention or management of bleeding-site complications following TAVR. The patient described in this case has consented to having his case described in this manuscript.